Hasan's piece is pretty good - not matter if it was already done in the comments section on the peice, it's worth pointing out in 'print' the manner in which Nick manages to offer a smug explanation of Godwin's Law before actually falling into that trap himself more than once, in the same fucking article. He does get subbed, very obviously - I can only imagine what a mess the piece was before they got their hands on it.
You know you're in trouble when you make Mehdi Hasan look like he's not a tiresome, pompous bore.
ReplyDeleteHasan's piece is pretty good - not matter if it was already done in the comments section on the peice, it's worth pointing out in 'print' the manner in which Nick manages to offer a smug explanation of Godwin's Law before actually falling into that trap himself more than once, in the same fucking article. He does get subbed, very obviously - I can only imagine what a mess the piece was before they got their hands on it.
ReplyDelete